<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reddit discussion considered productive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/</link>
	<description>Haskell programming journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kisakookoo</title>
		<link>http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kisakookoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi! Why I can&#039;t fill my info in profile? Can somebody help me?
My login is Kisakookoo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Why I can&#8217;t fill my info in profile? Can somebody help me?<br />
My login is Kisakookoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. k</title>
		<link>http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dr. k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean, let&#039;s say you have f(x) = x^3

Integral from (-a) to a of x^3 is 0. But the *area* is 2*integral of 0 to a of x^3. 

See?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, let&#8217;s say you have f(x) = x^3</p>
<p>Integral from (-a) to a of x^3 is 0. But the *area* is 2*integral of 0 to a of x^3. </p>
<p>See?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Franksen</title>
		<link>http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Franksen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You write: &quot;Moreover, this pair of analogies [derivative-as-angle, integral-as-area] doesn’t yield the basic result of the field (the fundamental theorem of calculus), and working directly with them forever means losing out big time...&quot;

Derivative-as-angle is a bad idea to start with. It doesn&#039;t even generalize properly to a two-dimensional domain. It should have long ago been completely replaced by the much more general (and still easy to understand)  local-approximation-by-a-linear-function.

However, integral-as-area generalizes quite well, even to the most abstract setting (measurable function on a measure space). What doesn&#039;t generalize is one concrete and very simple-minded method of /calculating/ the integral (the so-called &#039;Riemann-Integral&#039;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write: &#8220;Moreover, this pair of analogies [derivative-as-angle, integral-as-area] doesn’t yield the basic result of the field (the fundamental theorem of calculus), and working directly with them forever means losing out big time&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Derivative-as-angle is a bad idea to start with. It doesn&#8217;t even generalize properly to a two-dimensional domain. It should have long ago been completely replaced by the much more general (and still easy to understand)  local-approximation-by-a-linear-function.</p>
<p>However, integral-as-area generalizes quite well, even to the most abstract setting (measurable function on a measure space). What doesn&#8217;t generalize is one concrete and very simple-minded method of /calculating/ the integral (the so-called &#8216;Riemann-Integral&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Morrison</title>
		<link>http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Morrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntaxfree.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/reddit-discussion-considered-productive/#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;interact&quot; is your friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;interact&#8221; is your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
